Why the study?
What are the clinical determinants of poor six-minute walk test performance in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction compared to those without major structural heart disease?
What are the clinical determinants of poor six-minute walk test performance in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction compared to those without major structural heart disease?
Clinical predictors of poor 6-minute walk test performance are driven by similar physical, non-cardiovascular, and psychological factors in patients with and without major structural heart disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Shared predictors of poor 6-MWT performance warrant broad functional assessment in LVSD; leaves open whether modifying these factors improves outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The clinical determinants of six-minute walk test (6-MWT) performance in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) have rarely been investigated, and it is not clear whether they differ from patients referred for the assessment of symptoms of heart failure who do not have major structural heart disease (MSHD). METHODS AND RESULTS: 571 patients with LVSD enrolled in a chronic disease management programme (79% male; mean age 71+/-10 years; BMI 28+/-5) completed a 6-MWT with a mean distance 337+/-103 m. 688 patients referred with suspected heart failure but in whom MSHD was excluded (49% male; mean age 70+/-11 years; BMI 28+/-6) had a mean 6-MWT distance of 391+/-106 m (P<0.001 compared to patients with LVSD). Relationships with walking distance were determined by calculating odds ratios (ORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) for walking<or=300 versus >300 m. In patients with LVSD, predictors of poor walking distance (<or=300 m) included age>or=75 years (OR=4.0, 95% CI=2.4-6.4); low BMI (<20) (OR=3.4, 95% CI=1.6-7.3); anaemia (OR=2.8, 95% CI=1.8-4.2); resting heart rate>80 beats x min(-1) (OR=2.2, 95% CI=1.3-3.5); and being female (OR=2.0, 95% CI=1.3-3.0). Serum creatinine and NT-proBNP showed dose-response effects, as did self-perceived feelings of depression and anxiety. Determinants of 6-MWT in patients without MSHD were similar including age>or=75 years (OR=6.0, 95% CI=3.4-10.4), anaemia (OR=2.8, 95% CI=1.6-4.9), resting HR>80 beats x min(-1) (OR=2.5, 95% CI=1.4-4.4) and being female (OR=1.6, 95% CI=1.9-2.4). NT-proBNP and self-perceived feelings of depression and anxiety also showed dose-response effects. CONCLUSION: The determinants of poor 6-MWT performance depend on physical-cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular, and psychological factors. Clinical predictors for poor walking performance are similar for patients with LVSD and without MSHD.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ingle et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: