Why the study?
Do endothelin-1 receptor antagonists improve outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
Do endothelin-1 receptor antagonists improve outcomes in patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension?
This review highlights the pathogenic role of endothelin-1 in pulmonary arterial hypertension and summarizes the clinical trial evidence for endothelin receptor antagonists as a therapeutic strategy.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports ET-1 antagonists in PAH; leaves open optimal combinations and long-term outcomes in broader populations.
Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) is a rare but debilitating disease, which if left untreated rapidly progresses to right ventricular failure and eventually death. In the quest to understand the pathogenesis of this disease differences in the profile, expression and action of vasoactive substances released by the endothelium have been identified in patients with PAH. Of these, endothelin-1 (ET-1) is of particular interest since it is known to be an extremely powerful vasoconstrictor and also involved in vascular remodelling. Identification of ET-1 as a target for pharmacological intervention has lead to the discovery of a number of compounds that can block the receptors via which ET-1 mediates its effects. This review sets out the evidence in support of a role for ET-1 in the onset and progression of the disease and reviews the data from the various clinical trials of ET-1 receptor antagonists for the treatment of PAH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chester et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: