Why the study?
Does combination pharmacological therapy improve the balance of myocardial oxygen supply and demand compared to monotherapy in patients with ischaemic heart disease?
Does combination pharmacological therapy improve the balance of myocardial oxygen supply and demand compared to monotherapy in patients with ischaemic heart disease?
Combination therapy for ischemic heart disease provides a rational approach to optimizing the myocardial oxygen supply-demand balance.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports combination therapy for ischaemic heart disease; leaves open confirmation versus monotherapy in prospective trials.
Non-invasive treatment continues to be the mainstay of anti-ischaemic therapy. The imbalance between myocardial oxygen supply and demand provides the basis for myocardial ischaemia, which may present as symptomatic, asymptomatic or, in most cases, a mixture of the two. Both symptomatic and silent ischaemia are major prognostic indicators in patients with coronary artery disease and treatment should therefore be directed towards both the amelioration of symptoms and the resolution of the signs of ischaemia. Anti-ischaemic therapy may decrease oxygen demand, increase myocardial oxygen supply, or both. Interventional therapies, such as percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and bypass grafting, improve supply but do not alter demand. Drug therapy is associated with a variety of effects upon both supply and demand, depending upon the agent used. Nitrates alter both myocardial oxygen supply and demand, while beta-blockers decrease myocardial oxygen demand. Calcium channel blockers reduce after load and myocardial contractility and, thus, lower oxygen demand, while the coronary artery relaxation that occurs in response to their use acts to increase supply. The use of combination therapy is considered by many to be the most rational approach to the treatment of myocardial ischaemia, in that it allows maximal reduction in demand and increase in supply.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Peter F. Cohn (1997) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: