Background Migraine is a prevalent neurological disorder affecting adolescents, yet its prevalence and triggers remain underexplored in Malaysia. Identifying modifiable risk factors is crucial for early intervention and prevention strategies. Objective: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of adolescent migraine in Klang Valley, Malaysia, and assess common trigger factors, particularly their associations with gender and academic grade. Methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted among adolescents aged 14–18 years (n = 393) using convenience sampling. Participants completed an online survey, including the validated Migraine Screen Questionnaire (MS-Q) for migraine prevalence and a trigger factor assessment adapted from prior studies. Data were analyzed using SPSS v27, applying descriptive statistics, Pearson’s correlation, and significance testing (p < 0.05). Ethical approval was granted by the UTAR Scientific and Ethical Review Committee (U/SERC/224/2022), ensuring compliance with the Helsinki Declaration. Results: The prevalence of suspected migraine was 6.9%, with sensitivity to light/noise (64.1%) and restricted physical/intellectual activity (78.4%) being the most reported symptoms. Significant correlations were found between migraine triggers and gender, particularly electronic device use (r = 0.284, p = 0.001), lack of sleep (r = 0.270, p = 0.002), and emotional stress (r = 0.204, p = 0.011). Academic stress was significantly associated with migraine (p = 0.009), but study hours showed no significant correlation (p = 0.412). Conclusion: Academic stress, sleep disturbances, electronic device use, and dehydration were significant migraine triggers among adolescents. Findings highlight the need for school-based stress management, sleep hygiene education, and digital screen regulation to mitigate migraine risk. Future research should explore longitudinal patterns and targeted interventions for adolescent migraine prevention.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Selvakumar et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: