Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper presents a mathematical explanation of one of the Multi-Attribute Decision-Making (MADM) methods—the Ranking based on Distance and Range (RADAR) method—along with its modified variant, RADAR II. Through mathematical proofs, the influence of each step of the method on the final ranking of alternatives is analyzed. The methods are tested on three numerical examples with varying criterion weights. The robustness of the methods, as well as their fundamental characteristics, is demonstrated. A comparative analysis reveals that although both methods prioritize alternatives based on their stability across all criteria—particularly the most important ones—the RADAR II method is somewhat more rigorous and stringent, whereas the original RADAR method is more flexible and yields more objective results.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Komatina et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: