Why the study?
The association between positive heart-type fatty acid binding protein test results and adverse outcomes during one year of observation in NSTE-ACS patients with or without type 2 diabetes required investigation.
Does a positive h-FABP test predict adverse outcomes at 1 year in patients with NSTE-ACS, particularly those with type 2 diabetes?
Does a positive h-FABP test predict adverse outcomes at 1 year in patients with NSTE-ACS, particularly those with type 2 diabetes?
A positive h-FABP test at admission is a strong predictor of 1-year adverse outcomes in patients with NSTE-ACS, especially those with concomitant type 2 diabetes.
h-FABP positivity may flag higher NSTE-ACS risk; leaves open DM-2-specific prognostic value pending validation.
Aim. To study the association between a positive results of Heart-type fatty acid binding protein (h-FABP) test with the development of adverse outcomes during the year of observation in patients with non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) depending on the type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM-2) presence. Material and methods. The study included 153 patients with NSTEACS hospitalized in the department of emergency cardiology in the period from March 2014 to January 2017. In addition to the standard examination, all patients underwent a qualitative analysis on the h-FABP in venous blood. Results. Kaplan–Meier estimator demonstrated a significant probability of a combined end point in patients with positive h-FABP, both with and without DM-2. H-FABP also acts as a marker for the development of adverse outcomes during the year after NSTE-ACS. Patients with adverse outcomes and type 2 diabetes mellitus had the highest frequency (100%) of positive test reactions. Conclusion. H-FABP positive test when admitted to hospital may be considered as a predictor of adverse long-term outcomes in patients with NSTE-ACS. That statistics is most significant for patients with DM-2.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Бернс et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: