Reveals alterations in excitation-inhibition balance in multiple sclerosis, indicating potential neuroimaging strategies for understanding the disease.
Excitation-Inhibition (E/I) balance is a system-level principle governing healthy neuronal information processing. Its disruption has been implicated in the pathophysiology of multiple sclerosis (MS), yet in vivo characterization of E/I balance in MS remains under debate. In MS, altered neural dynamics are thought to reflect widespread structural damage and functional reorganization. Previous studies have suggested E/I imbalance in MS, but available methods require electrophysiology and do not allow investigation using functional MRI (fMRI). As a result, E/I alterations in MS cannot currently be quantified from the large body of existing MRI data. Here, we show that E/I alterations in MS can be captured with multimodal MRI data. We employ a recent multimodal MRI-based neurocomputational framework to infer E/I balance, integrating structural and functional information. We find that people with MS have significantly lower E/I balance during resting state, in the somatomotor and default mode networks as defined from a functionally-based atlas. Furthermore, we discover a significant negative correlation between the E/I reductions in the somatomotor network and motor fatigue, linking inferred circuit dynamics to clinical parameters. These findings reveal that E/I imbalance in MS can be captured using fMRI-informed modeling, extending previous electrophysiological observations. They provide converging evidence that circuit-level dysregulation underlies clinical symptoms. By building on a framework previously validated in Alzheimer’s disease, our results support the robustness of this approach across disorders. This work establishes a scalable and non-invasive strategy to probe E/I balance in MS. It opens a new avenue to exploit the large body of available fMRI data to advance our understanding of circuit dysfunction in the disease.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zin et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: