Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Evaluates UAV ISAC channel behavior through joint monostatic and bistatic measurements, indicating system effectiveness.
Low-altitude unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV)-integrated sensing and communication (ISAC) channels are governed by rapidly evolving multipath. These dynamics arise from UAV motion, air–ground geometry, and scene-dependent scatterers, yet field evidence comparing monostatic and bistatic sensing links remains limited. We develop a cooperative monostatic–bistatic measurement system for low-altitude UAV ISAC channel sounding. The system integrates a UAV-borne sensing node, a ground node, synchronized acquisition, and an offline processing chain. It enables UAV-borne monostatic sensing and air–ground bistatic sensing to be measured within the same low-altitude urban scenario. A field measurement campaign is conducted along a representative route containing buildings, trees, roadside facilities, and open ground. From the measured in-phase/quadrature (IQ) data, the system extracts channel impulse responses (CIRs) and power delay profiles (PDPs) as primary measurement products. Delay–Doppler processing, multipath-component extraction, and trajectory analysis are applied to compare link-dependent propagation behavior under matched environmental conditions. The measurement results demonstrate that the proposed platform can jointly capture monostatic and bistatic ISAC channel responses and support controlled and synchronized low-altitude UAV channel measurement experiments. This system provides an experimental basis for UAV ISAC channel modeling, measurement-platform assessment, and subsequent sensing algorithm evaluation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ming et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: