This research establishes Sanatan Dharma as an enduring foundation for sociology, suggesting its essential role in human moral agency and social organization.
This research paper establishes a new epistemological foundation for sociology by decoupling the eternal science of human existence from historically contingent institutional constructs. Challenging the Eurocentric positivist origins of 19th-century social science, the study posits that Sanatan Dharma is not a religion, culture, or sectarian ideology, but the primordial, invariant operating code of human life instituted prior to human creation. Utilizing a precise semantic framework, this paper distinguishes between Dharma (immutable existence and cosmic responsibility), Religion/Sanskruti (fluid institutional identity), Culture/Sabhyata (dynamic lifestyle), and Sect/Sampradaya (ideology). The paper analyzes how humanity's moral agency differentiates human existence from biological determinism, requiring conscious adherence to ethical duty. It details the eight structural elements of human civilization—rituals, food, attire, language, dance, music, festivals, and architecture—and examines how man-made religious systems serve as operational containers for Sanatan principles. Furthermore, by integrating the four Purusharthas (Dharma, Artha, Kama, Moksha), the study provides a robust sociological model for pluralism, cultural adaptability, and the moral authority of individual and social reform. Ultimately, this work offers a decolonized paradigm for understanding social organization, bridging ancient cosmological wisdom with modern sociological rigor.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kedi Ganapati (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: