Analyzes vibration evolution and causality in bearings, suggesting new insights into failure mechanisms.
To address the challenges in understanding the raceway failure mechanisms of bearings under dynamic radial excitations, this study proposes a vibration evolution analysis method based on multi-source data fusion and a Granger causality test. Firstly, a vertical bearing vibration test bench that can simulate the dynamic excitation in engineering practice is built, and the bearing acceleration, inner ring displacement and cage data are collected at the same time. Subsequently, the evolution law and correlation relationship of bearing vibration signals during the expansion process of bearing raceway damage were studied. Based on this, a multi-source vibration data fusion method was proposed, and the effectiveness of different data fusion schemes in characterizing raceway damage expansion was compared. Finally, the Granger causality test was applied to analyze the causal relationship between the evolution of various vibration behaviors during the damage propagation process. Research results demonstrate that under complex loading conditions during sustained operation, the “False Brinelling” indentation gradually develops into raceway surface damage. The vibration behavior of bearings exhibits distinct stage-specific characteristics under dynamic radial excitations. Notably, variations in vibration behavior amplitude and transition timing between different operational phases demonstrate significant discrepancies. Significant alterations in causal relationships between vibration behaviors were observed throughout different degradation phases. The combined approach proposed in this paper, encompassing complex load simulation, multi-source data fusion, and causal analysis, offers a new understanding of the raceway failure mechanism of bearings under real-world operating conditions.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Li et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: