Proof-of-concept method enhances measurement accuracy of large mirrors, suggesting a viable alternative to laser systems.
Precise measurement of large mirrors is essential for high-performance space-based optics. Traditionally, laser interferometry provides high accuracy but faces challenges related to the requirements of computer-generated holograms (CGHs) and the transformation of standard wavefronts to match complex test surfaces. This paper presents a proof-of-concept contact-based surface metrology method for large mirrors. To reduce drift errors caused by stylus instability or contact loss, a wavefront-based calibration method was developed to suppress measurement artifacts while preserving intrinsic surface errors. The method was tested on a concave aspherical mirror using a tactile coordinate measuring machine (CMM), and its accuracy was evaluated by comparing deviations between calibrated CMM error maps and laser-based measurements. Experimental results demonstrated that the XENO CMM achieved a global metric accuracy comparable to interferometric systems for relevant geometric parameters. These findings suggest that ultra-precision CMMs combined with focus point calibration can provide practical preliminary surface verification and serve as a flexible alternative to laser interferometry when global geometric accuracy is the primary concern. Future work will enhance robustness by addressing higher-order aberrations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tam et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: