Key result
MRA use in patients with ATTR-CM receiving disease-modifying therapy was not associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.82-1.32).
Why the study?
Does mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use reduce all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy receiving disease-modifying therapy?
Cohort (n=4,598)
Yes
Does mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist use reduce all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy receiving disease-modifying therapy?
Hazard Ratio: 1.04 (95% CI 0.82–1.32)
p-value: p=0.73
In patients with ATTR-CM receiving disease-modifying therapy, the addition of MRAs does not appear to provide incremental clinical benefit for mortality or heart failure hospitalization.
Background Whether mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) confer incremental clinical benefit in patients with transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) treated with disease-modifying therapy remains uncertain. We aimed to assess the effectiveness and safety of MRAs in patients with ATTR-CM receiving disease-modifying therapy. Methods This retrospective cohort study used data from the TriNetX US database to identify adult patients with ATTR-CM who initiated disease-modifying therapy (tafamidis or vutrisiran) within 1 year of incident heart failure (HF) diagnosis between 1 September 2019 and 10 December 2025. Patients were categorised as MRA users or non-users and were matched based on 1:1 propensity-score matching. The primary effectiveness endpoint was a composite of all-cause mortality or HF hospitalisation (HFH). Secondary effectiveness endpoints were all-cause mortality, HFH and ventricular arrhythmia (VA). The safety endpoint was hyperkalaemia. Results Among 4598 patients with ATTR-CM (mean (SD) age, 77.6 (8.4) years; 3726 (81.0%) men) treated with tafamidis (n=4386) or vutrisiran (n=377), 505 MRA users were matched to 505 non-users. MRA use was not associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality or HFH (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.32; p=0.73). There was no significant difference in all-cause mortality (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.70 to 1.46; p=0.96), HFH (HR 1.09; 95% CI 0.84 to 1.43; p=0.48) and VA (HR 1.07; 95% CI 0.77 to 1.48; p=0.67). Hyperkalaemia was not significantly higher in MRA users (HR 1.13; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.44; p=0.29) compared with non-users. Conclusions In a contemporary cohort of patients with ATTR-CM treated with disease-modifying therapy, MRA use was associated with limited incremental clinical benefits.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chi et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Transthyretin amyloid cardiomyopathy (ATTR-CM) (n=4,598). Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists (MRAs) vs. Non-users was evaluated on Composite of all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalisation (HFH) (HR 1.04, 95% CI 0.82 to 1.32, p=0.73). MRA use in patients with ATTR-CM receiving disease-modifying therapy was not associated with significant reductions in all-cause mortality or heart failure hospitalization (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.82-1.32).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: