Key result
DCB for prepared ACS lesions is linked to a ~7% one-year target lesion revascularization rate.
Why the study?
DCB PCI avoids permanent metallic scaffolding in selected ACS lesions, but clinical interpretation depends on lesion preparation, procedural selection, and follow-up ascertainment.
Observational (n=276)
Yes
In selected acute coronary syndrome lesions that pass a procedural preparation gate, drug-coated balloon treatment is feasible and associated with acceptable 12-month clinical outcomes.
Low TLR rates support DCB feasibility in selected prepared ACS lesions; hypothesis-generating and requires randomized trials before practice change.
Drug-coated balloon (DCB) PCI can avoid permanent metallic scaffolding in selected acute coronary syndrome (ACS) lesions, but interpretation depends on lesion preparation, procedural selection, and follow-up ascertainment. We analyzed a retrospective dual-center registry of 276 unique patients who underwent one index DCB-treated ACS procedure after operator-judged adequate lesion preparation. Presentations were NSTEMI in 174 patients (63.0%), STEMI in 90 (32.6%), and unstable angina in 12 (4.3%). Paclitaxel-coated DCBs were used in 262 patients (94.9%) and sirolimus/non-paclitaxel DCBs in 14 (5.1%). Thrombus aspiration and GP IIb/IIIa inhibitors were used selectively in 17 (6.2%) and 28 (10.1%) patients, respectively. Bail-out stenting was required in 13 patients (4.7%). Predominantly benign/non-flow-limiting angiographic dissection was recorded in 18 patients (6.5%). A follow-up of at least 365 days or death within 365 days was available for 274 patients (99.3%). Clinically driven TLR occurred in 18 patients (crude 18/274, 6.6%; Kaplan–Meier 365-day estimate, 6.8%; 95% CI, 4.3–10.5), all occurring between 3 and 9 months. All-cause death occurred in 12 patients (Kaplan–Meier estimate, 4.4%; 95% CI, 2.5–7.5). In selected ACS lesions that passed a preparation gate, DCB treatment was associated with feasible procedural results and acceptable 12-month clinically recorded outcomes. The findings do not estimate all-comer DCB eligibility and should not be interpreted in terms of the efficacy of DCBs compared with DESs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jurin et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute Coronary Syndrome (n=276). Drug-coated balloon (DCB) treatment was evaluated on Clinically driven target lesion revascularization (TLR) within 365 days (95% CI 4.3-10.5). In selected acute coronary syndrome lesions that passed a preparation gate, drug-coated balloon treatment was associated with a 365-day Kaplan-Meier estimate of 6.8% for clinically driven target lesion revascularization.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: