Key result
DCB shows ~96% procedural success and low 6-month MACE across de novo and ISR lesions.
Why the study?
The role of drug-coated balloon angioplasty in de novo coronary lesions remains under investigation, and multicenter data evaluating procedural and clinical outcomes are limited.
Observational (n=244)
Yes
In a real-world multicenter registry, drug-coated balloon angioplasty demonstrated high procedural success (96%) and low 6-month MACE (7.7%) for both de novo and in-stent restenosis lesions.
Supports real-world DCB use for de novo and ISR lesions; extends RCT evidence to routine practice.
Background Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty is currently recommended by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) as a Class I, Level A-therapy for the treatment of in-stent restenosis (ISR). Its role in de novo coronary lesions remains under investigation, particularly in real-world clinical practice. Despite their expanding use, multi-center data evaluating both procedural and clinical outcomes are still limited. Purpose To assess procedural success and six-month clinical outcomes of DCB angioplasty in a real-world, multicenter setting. Methods This prospective, observational registry included 244 consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with DCB between January 2024 and September 2025 across 3 tertiary, Greek cardiac centers. Clinical, angiographic and procedural data were prospectively collected. Procedural success was defined as achievement of TIMI 3 flow without procedural failure or bailout stenting. Clinical follow-up was performed at 1, 3, and 6 months via structured telephone interviews. Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) were defined as the composite of cardiac death, target lesion failure, target vessel re-vascularization or unplanned re-hospitalization. Results The mean age was 67.4 ± 10.8 years and 88.5% were men. Clinical presentation included stable coronary artery disease (≈85%) and acute coronary syndromes (≈15%). DCB angioplasty was performed in de novo lesions (80.8%) and ISR (19.2%). Target vessels included LAD (50.3%), RCA (18.5%), and LCx (13.9%). DCB diameters were mainly 2.5 mm (36.8%), 2.0 mm (29%) and 3.0 mm (25%), while lengths were predominantly 15 mm (42.4%) and 25 mm (26.3%). A hybrid DCB–DES approach was used in 51.4%, while DCB-only PCI accounted for 48.6%. Procedural success was 96%. At 6-month follow-up (no contact 10%), 7 (3.1%) target lesion failure, 9 (4%) target lesion re-vascularization and 1 cardiac death (0.045%) were recorded. The overall 6-month MACE rate was 7.7%, with 2.7% in de novo lesions and 5% in ISR lesions, respectively. Conclusions In this multicenter real-world registry, DCB angioplasty demonstrated high procedural success (96%) and low 6-month MACE (7.7%) across both de novo and ISR lesions. These findings reinforce the safety and efficacy of a DCB-based strategy, supporting its evolving role into contemporary PCI practice, so long as adequate lesion preparation is preceded.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tsiamis et al. (2026) conducted an observational in De novo and in-stent restenosis coronary lesions (n=244). Drug-coated balloon (DCB) angioplasty was evaluated on Major adverse cardiac events (MACE) at 6 months. Drug-coated balloon angioplasty demonstrated 96% procedural success and a 7.7% 6-month MACE rate across de novo and in-stent restenosis lesions.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: