Cross-sectional study examines how sex hormones affect antibody persistence in college students, suggesting sex hormones are key biomarkers.
Background: Sex-related differences in SARS-CoV-2 viral susceptibility, severity, and recovery are prevalent. Factors such as age and biological variation provide some explanation for immune response, yet the use of biological sex as a variable may limit understanding of underlying individual mechanisms related to endocrine–immune function involved in long-term immune memory. Endogenous sex hormone concentrations provide a means to assess the magnitude or durability of antibody persistence and disease recovery. Objective: This study examined salivary concentrations of 17β-estradiol and testosterone, as well as the number of weeks since prior SARS-CoV-2 viral infection. The study aimed to determine whether endogenous sex hormones contributed additional explanatory value to antibody persistence beyond biological sex. Methods: A cross-sectional study included 75 college students (63% female) who reported weeks since previous SARS-CoV-2 infection (M = 15.41, SD = 7.13), confirmed through a positive SARS-CoV-2 anti-N rapid antibody test. Participants provided saliva samples, which were tested for concentration of 17β-estradiol and testosterone. Hierarchical multiple regression analyses examined the effects of biological sex and endogenous sex hormones on the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies following natural infection. Results: 17β-estradiol was the strongest positive predictor of SARS-CoV-2 antibody persistence (β = 0.63, p < 0.001). Departing from previous findings, biological sex was not a significant predictor of antibodies targeting the SARS-CoV-2 N protein. Conclusions: Findings underscored the role of estradiol on immune recovery in a healthy young adult population. Individual hormone variation appears more informative than sex classification for understanding antibody persistence and immune response.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ivaska et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: