Randomized trial demonstrates enhanced cycling stability of lithium cobalt oxide with new modifications, suggesting improved battery performance.
Lithium cobalt oxide (LiCoO 2 , LCO) is a critical cathode material for high‐energy‐density lithium‐ion batteries, yet its application above 4.55 V (vs. Li/Li + ) is severely limited by structural degradation via the O3→H1‐3 phase transition, lattice oxygen loss, and cobalt dissolution. Here, we report a synergistic bulk‐surface modification strategy combining Zr‐pillaring (LZCO) with in situ LiCoPO 4 coating (LZCO@P) to stabilize LCO at 4.65 V. Zr‐pillaring stabilizes the lattice and suppresses phase transition by expanding the O 2p‐Co 3d band gap, as suggested by density functional theory (DFT), to mitigate oxygen redox activity. Lattice‐matched interfacial engineering between LZCO and LiCoPO 4 coating results from interfacial P–O tetrahedral formation, which enhances mechanical adhesion and reduces oxygen surface reactivity of LZCO. Consequently, LZCO@P achieves 80.8% capacity retention after 1000 cycles at 1 C (3.5–4.65 V) and 91.2% after 1000 cycles at 3 C (3.5–4.65 V). A practical Li||LZCO@P pouch cell retains 92.3% capacity after 160 cycles at 1 C (3.0–4.6 V). The synergistic bulk‐surface modification strategy contributes through different mechanisms and comprehensively improves the cycling stability of LZCO@P at 4.65 V.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: