Assessment of intravenous thrombolytic therapy response in acute ischemic stroke using NIHSS changes and laboratory parameters
Why the study?
Do baseline laboratory parameters (calcium and basophils) predict clinical response to intravenous thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Population
33 adult patients with a confirmed diagnosis of acute ischemic stroke who presented to the emergency…
Design
Cohort
Follow-up
3 months
Key result
Higher baseline basophil levels demonstrated significant discriminative ability in predicting early clinical improvement (AUC 0.813) in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous thrombolytic therapy.
Authors
Loading...
May improve prognostic accuracy by pairing NIHSS with labs after IVTT; leaves open validation in prospective cohorts.
Observational (n=33)
No
Do baseline laboratory parameters (calcium and basophils) predict clinical response to intravenous thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke?
Higher baseline basophil and serum calcium levels may predict early clinical improvement following intravenous thrombolytic therapy in patients with acute ischemic stroke, though larger studies are needed to confirm these exploratory findings.
Effect estimate: AUC 0.813 (95% CI 0.645-0.981)
p-value: p=0.005
Nogay et al. (2026) conducted an observational in Acute ischemic stroke (n=33). Baseline serum calcium and basophil levels vs. Patients without clinical improvement was evaluated on Clinical improvement (≥4-point reduction in NIHSS score at 24 hours) (AUC 0.813, 95% CI 0.645-0.981, p=0.005). Higher baseline basophil levels demonstrated significant discriminative ability in predicting early clinical improvement (AUC 0.813) in acute ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous thrombolytic therapy.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: