Why the study?
While early NIHSS scores predict outcomes in acute ischemic stroke, the prognostic value of discharge NIHSS after intravenous thrombolysis remains unclear.
Does the discharge NIHSS score better predict poor 3-month functional outcomes compared to baseline or 24-hour NIHSS scores in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis?
Does the discharge NIHSS score better predict poor 3-month functional outcomes compared to baseline or 24-hour NIHSS scores in patients with acute ischemic stroke receiving intravenous thrombolysis?
In acute ischemic stroke patients receiving intravenous thrombolysis, a discharge NIHSS score ≥ 4.5 represents a highly accurate and practical tool to predict poor 3-month functional outcomes, outperforming baseline and 24-hour assessments.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support discharge NIHSS for post-thrombolysis prognostication; leaves open prospective validation before practice change.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: While early National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores are predictive of outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke (AIS), the prognostic value of the discharge NIHSS score after intravenous thrombolysis (IVT) remains unclear. We aimed to determine whether the discharge NIHSS score outperforms baseline, 24-hour, and early change indicators in predicting poor 3-month outcomes (modified Rankin scale [mRS] score of 3-6). METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 554 AIS patients who received IVT at our stroke center from May 2022 to March 2024. NIHSS scores were assessed at baseline, 24 h, and discharge. Absolute (baseline minus discharge) and percentage (absolute change/baseline × 100%) NIHSS changes were calculated. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to assess the independent correlation between different NIHSS scores and poor outcomes. Predictive performance was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves, net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI). The optimal cutoff was 4.5 (sensitivity 90.5%, specificity 86.0%). Adding the discharge NIHSS score to the 24-hour NIHSS score significantly improved reclassification (NRI 123.4%, IDI 9.1%). The discharge NIHSS score consistently outperformed the 24-hour NIHSS score in predicting poor 3-month functional outcomes across all key patient subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: This study revealed a notable association between the discharge NIHSS score and poor 3-month outcomes in thrombolysis-eligible patients with AIS, particularly in those with moderate stroke severity. These findings complement the established prognostic value of the 24-hour NIHSS score and may guide postacute care planning.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhu et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: