Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Tests a new control framework optimizing output regulation in dynamic systems, suggesting improved methods for regulation without traditional limitations.
This preprint develops an exact-data theory for simultaneous local ARMA fitting and data-driven model predictive control without requiring coefficient recovery. At each decision time k, the unknown plant is assumed to admit an exact order-nₐ monic ARMA representation on the complete realized controller window ₖ=-nₚ,…,k+nf\. The representing coefficient matrix may depend on the window. The admissible coefficient class is compact, and every direct-input block has full row rank. This assumption is trajectory-wise: it concerns the realized finite input-output segment and neither imposes one global LTI model on the unknown plant nor requires an eventual fixed local model. The controller has two stages. First, a lexicographic problem jointly selects an exact past-fitting ARMA matrix and a nominal MPC input sequence. Exact fitting has absolute priority, robust regulation of the first predicted output has second priority, and the remaining finite-horizon objective has third priority. Second, a bounded perturbation is selected from a full-dimensional box whose radius is positive at every finite time and vanishes asymptotically. The perturbation is used to preserve a prescribed sliding-window persistence-of-excitation rank condition of the actually implemented input whenever the corresponding one-step rank-reachability condition holds. The central result is one-step informativity rather than coefficient uniqueness. Any fixed order-nₐ ARMA relation admits a finite-dimensional LTI delay-state embedding of known dimension. Corollary~1 of Yu et al. then implies that, under sufficiently high-order persistent excitation of a measured input prefix, the realized current length-(nₐ+1) input-output segment is parameterizable by earlier segments of the same local trajectory even if the embedding is uncontrollable. Removing the current-output block from this trajectory identity shows that the implemented ARMA regressor belongs to the column space of the measured past regression matrix. Hence every exact past-fitting ARMA matrix gives the same implemented one-step prediction. The whole-window exactness assumption then identifies this common prediction with the actual output at the implemented current sample. The first-stage problem is shown to admit a global lexicographic solution in the exact-data setting. Its secondary optimum admits the explicit expressionη1,k⁼ρₖminM∈ Fₖ\|B₀(M)\|_∞, and therefore η1,k^≤ b₀ρₖ. Combining this bound with one-step informativity yields \|yₖ\|_∞≤ b₀ρₖ→0. Thus asymptotic output regulation follows without a maximal McMillan-degree condition, full-rank ARMA regression, coefficient uniqueness, overlap gluing, a separate asymptotic coefficient-identifiability assumption, or eventual LTI behavior. The convergence proof uses only the restriction of the whole-window assumption through the implemented current sample, while the stronger whole-window formulation is retained as the structural model assumption of the DDMPC framework.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Roozbeh Abolpour (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: