Latent profile analysis reveals risky sexual and drinking motives in women with sexual victimization histories, suggesting the need for targeted interventions.
Women with childhood sexual abuse (CSA) and adolescent/adult sexual assault (ASA) histories demonstrate higher levels of heavy drinking and risky sexual behaviors. Sex motives and sex-related drinking motives provide insight into why individuals may engage in these behaviors. The current study uses Latent Profile Analysis (LPA) to examine profiles of co-occurring sex motives and sex-related drinking motives and their relationships with CSA and ASA. Women (n = 489) completed the Sexual Motivations Scale and the Drinking Motives Questionnaire. Average scores for each domain of sex motives (intimacy, enhancement, self-affirmation, coping, peer approval, and partner approval) and sex-related drinking motives (enhancement and coping with sex-related distress) were used to conduct the LPA. A 5-profile solution was identified. One profile (n = 45) emerged as particularly risky with highest levels of coping, partner and peer approval sex motives, and sex-related drinking motives. Next, the presence of CSA (n = 136, 28%) and ASA (n = 257, 53%) were used to predict LPA profile membership through multinomial logistic regression. Women who experienced CSA (OR = 2.06, p < .05) or ASA (OR = 2.24, p < .05) had significantly higher odds of belonging to the high approval and drinking motives profile compared to the reference class. The findings highlight heterogeneity in the co-occurrence of sex motives and sex-related drinking motives. Women with CSA or ASA histories were significantly more likely to belong to the high approval and drinking motives profile, which reflects a riskier motivational pattern and underscores the need for targeted interventions addressing overlapping sex and drinking motives to mitigate risky behaviors and negative health outcomes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: