Why the study?
Do h-FABP and PESI better predict 30-day adverse outcomes compared to BNP and cTnI-Ultra in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
Do h-FABP and PESI better predict 30-day adverse outcomes compared to BNP and cTnI-Ultra in patients with acute pulmonary embolism?
The combination of h-FABP and PESI provides superior risk stratification for acute pulmonary embolism compared to BNP and troponin, effectively identifying low-risk patients in the emergency department.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
h-FABP may aid PE risk stratification in the ED; observational data leave open prospective validation versus BNP or troponin.
OBJECTIVES: Heart-type fatty acid-binding protein (h-FABP), sensitive troponins, natriuretic peptides, and clinical scores such as the Pulmonary Embolism Severity Index (PESI) are candidates for risk stratification of patients with acute pulmonary embolism (PE). The aim was to compare their respective prognostic values to predict an adverse outcome at 1 month. METHODS: The authors prospectively included 132 consecutive patients with confirmed acute PE. On admission to the emergency department (ED), plasma concentrations of h-FABP, sensitive cardiac troponin I-Ultra (cTnI-Ultra), and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were measured and the PESI calculated in all patients. The combined 30-day outcomes of interest were death, cardiac arrest, mechanical ventilation, use of catecholamines, and recurrence of acute PE. RESULTS: During the first 30 days, 14 (10.6%) patients suffered complications. Among the biomarkers, h-FABP above 6 μg/L was a stronger predictor of an unfavorable outcome (odds ratio [OR] = 17.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 4.2 to 73.3) than BNP > 100 pg/mL (OR = 5.7, 95% CI = 1.6 to 20.4) or cTnI-Ultra > 0.05 μg/L (OR = 3.4, 95% CI = 1.1 to 10.9). The PESI classified 83 of 118 patients (70.3%) with favorable outcomes and only one of 14 (7%) with adverse outcomes in low class I or II (OR = 30.8, 95% CI = 3.2 to 299.7). The areas under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUCs) were 0.90 (95% CI = 0.81 to 0.98) for h-FABP, 0.89 (95% CI = 0.82 to 0.96) for PESI, 0.79 (95% CI = 0.67 to 0.90) for BNP, and 0.76 (95% CI = 0.64 to 0.87) for cTnI-Ultra. The combination of h-FABP with PESI was a particularly useful prognostic indicator because none of the 79 patients (59.8%) with h-FABP < 6 ng/mL and PESI class < III had an adverse outcome. CONCLUSIONS: h-FABP and the PESI are superior to BNP and cTnI-Ultra as markers for risk stratification of patients with acute PE. The high sensitivity of their combination identified a large number of low-risk patients in the ED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lauque et al. (2014) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: