Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Explores machine learning efficacy for monitoring bridge scour, suggesting enhanced safety measures.
Bridge scour threatens bridge safety and serviceability, yet the growing application of Machine Learning (ML) has not produced a unified understanding of how sensing sources, learning tasks and validation practices influence monitoring capability. This article addresses this gap through a taxonomy of 53 ML-based bridge-scour studies and a simulation-based railway case study examining the relatively underexplored use of displacement-related drive-by measurements for scour detection and support-level localisation. The dataset comprises 2924 simulated crossings involving four bridge models and three train types, with scour represented by reductions in vertical support stiffness. Full-bridge and support-centred Discrete Wavelet Transform and Autoregressive with exogenous inputs-derived Markov features are used to train Artificial Neural Network, Random Forest (RF) and Support Vector Machine classifiers under nested cross-validation. Batch inputs incorporate information from consecutive crossings. Among the highest-performing detection configurations, rear-mounted RF using 31-crossing batches achieved 0.990 accuracy and F1 scores of 0.994 and 0.977 for the scoured and healthy classes. The best localisation configuration, front-mounted RF using seven-crossing batches, achieved 0.968 accuracy, with both F1 scores approximately 0.97. These simulation-based results do not demonstrate transfer to unseen bridges or field-confirmed scoured conditions but indicate potential for bridge screening and targeted inspection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tola et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: