Why the study?
Do small molecule coagulation cascade inhibitors improve the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolic disease compared to traditional therapies?
Do small molecule coagulation cascade inhibitors improve the treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolic disease compared to traditional therapies?
Novel oral anticoagulants (Factor Xa and thrombin inhibitors) in development promise to overcome the limitations of traditional anticoagulants by offering predictable pharmacokinetics and eliminating the need for routine monitoring.
May support development of monitoring-free oral anticoagulants; leaves open outcome superiority versus traditional agents in venous thromboembolism.
Venous thromboembolic disease, including deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism, is a cause of significant mortality and morbidity. For several decades, anticoagulant options for the treatment and prevention of thrombosis have been limited mainly to agents such as unfractionated heparin and oral vitamin K antagonists such as warfarin. Although these therapies have proven benefits, they also have important limitations that result in their underuse in routine clinical practice. A variety of novel anticoagulants with improved pharmacologic and clinical profiles are in development, offering benefits over traditional therapies. Specifically, progress has been made in the development of small molecule Factor Xa inhibitors and thrombin inhibitors. The most advanced drugs reviewed include DPC-423, DPC-602, razaxaban, GSK's 813893, Portola's Xa inhibitors (formerly Millennium), otamixaban, DU-176b, KFA-1982, BAY-59-7939, DX-9065a, YM-150, LY-517717, Exanta, 3DP's thrombin inhibitors, SSR-182289, LB-30057, LB-30870, BIBR-1048 and Merck's thrombin inhibitors. With their potentially consistent and predictable pharmacological profile, oral formulation, and decreased need for coagulation monitoring, these new agents will likely increase the use and duration of anticoagulation treatment in thromboembolic disorders and reduce the burden associated with long-term management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Saiah et al. (2005) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: