Key result
Metabolic syndrome in cardiac rehabilitation participants was associated with a slower rate of improvement in exercise capacity compared to those without metabolic syndrome (β= -0.28; 95% CI -0.34 to -0.23).
Why the study?
Does metabolic syndrome reduce the rate of improvement in exercise capacity in cardiac rehabilitation participants?
Cohort (n=250)
Yes
Does metabolic syndrome reduce the rate of improvement in exercise capacity in cardiac rehabilitation participants?
Mean Difference: -0.28 (95% CI -0.34–-0.23)
Metabolic syndrome and elevated BMI are associated with slower improvements in exercise capacity during cardiac rehabilitation, with significant variation in outcomes observed between different CR programs.
May warrant tailored cardiac rehabilitation protocols for metabolic syndrome; leaves open whether modifying it augments exercise capacity gains.
Background: Metabolic syndrome prevalence in cardiac rehabilitation (CR) is high and participants have poor baseline and overall improvement in exercise capacity; however, it is unclear if this is due to participant or CR programlevel factors. The purpose of this research was to describe, in CR participants, the association between metabolic syndrome and change in exercise capacity, and to examine exercise capacity variation by CR program. Methods: Data was abstracted from medical charts in four CR programs. A three-category exposure variable was defined as BMI<27 (reference group) and no metabolic syndrome (n=73), BMI ≥ 27 without metabolic syndrome (n=21), and metabolic syndrome (n=156). Hierarchical linear models examined the association between metabolic syndrome and the rate of change in exercise capacity and variation in exercise capacity by CR program. Results: Sixty-two percent of participants had metabolic syndrome. In multivariable analyses, participants with BMI ≥ 27 without metabolic syndrome and those with metabolic syndrome had slower rates of change in exercise capacity compared to the reference group (β= -0.20, 95% confidence interval (CI): -0.29,-0.10; and β= -0.28, CI: -0.34,- 0.23, respectively). There was no difference between the BMI ≥ 27 without metabolic syndrome and the metabolic syndrome groups. Twenty-seven percent of the difference in exercise capacity was due to CR program. Conclusions: Participants with metabolic syndrome had slower rates of improvement in exercise capacity compared to those without metabolic syndrome. Variation between CR programs highlights the need for standard management of all CR participants but especially for those with metabolic syndrome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lyzen et al. (2013) conducted a cohort in Metabolic syndrome in cardiac rehabilitation (n=250). Metabolic syndrome vs. BMI < 27 and no metabolic syndrome was evaluated on Rate of change in exercise capacity (β= -0.28, 95% CI -0.34, -0.23). Metabolic syndrome in cardiac rehabilitation participants was associated with a slower rate of improvement in exercise capacity compared to those without metabolic syndrome (β= -0.28; 95% CI -0.34 to -0.23).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: