Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The surface passivation of p - and n -type silicon by different chemically grown SiO 2 films (prepared by HNO 3 , H 2 SO 4 /H 2 O 2 and HCl/H 2 O 2 treatments) was investigated after PECVD of a -SiN x :H and ALD of Al 2 O 3 capping films. The wet chemically grown SiO 2 films were compared to thermally grown SiO 2 and the surface passivation was benchmarked against single-layer a -SiN x :H and Al 2 O 3 films deposited on HF-last Si surfaces. Directly after PECVD and ALD the surface passivation was found to be similar for all chemically grown SiO 2 stacks and higher than for the single-layer films. After annealing at 400°C the level of surface passivation improved but remained similar for the chemically grown SiO 2 stacks. Corona charging experiments on the annealed chemically grown SiO 2 /Al 2 O 3 stacks revealed that the fixed charge density, i.e. the field-effect passivation, was lower compared to single-layer Al 2 O 3 films whereas the chemical passivation was found to be higher. The surface passivation was also investigated as a function of the annealing time. Chemically grown SiO 2 stacks achieved the maximum level of surface passivation after annealing for half a minute which is different from the stacks with a -SiN x :H and Al 2 O 3 films deposited on thermally grown SiO 2 or HF-last Si surfaces which required considerably longer annealing times.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bordihn et al. (2012) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: