Key result
In treatment-naïve patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, dabigatran (HR 0.96), rivaroxaban (HR 1.12), and apixaban (HR 0.97) were similarly effective as warfarin in preventing ischemic stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism over 1 year.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to compare the effectiveness and safety of warfarin and the DOACs dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation in routine care.
Do direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) reduce ischemic stroke, TIA, systemic embolism, or bleeding compared to warfarin in treatment-naïve patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Cohort (n=30,820)
Do direct oral anticoagulants (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) reduce ischemic stroke, TIA, systemic embolism, or bleeding compared to warfarin in treatment-naïve patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation?
Hazard Ratio: 0.96 (95% CI 0.71–1.28)
Absolute Event Rate: 2.48% vs 2.99%
In routine clinical practice, DOACs demonstrated similar effectiveness to warfarin for stroke prevention in non-valvular atrial fibrillation, with comparable or superior safety profiles regarding bleeding.
DOACs showed comparable effectiveness and similar or better safety versus warfarin in routine AF care; supports but leaves open practice change pending confirmatory trials.
OBJECTIVE: To compare effectiveness and safety of warfarin and the direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) dabigatran, rivaroxaban and apixaban in non-valvular atrial fibrillation in routine care. METHODS: From nationwide registries, we identified treatment-naïve patients initiating warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban or apixaban for non-valvular atrial fibrillation from July 2013 to December 2015 in Norway. We assessed prescription duration using reverse waiting time distribution. Adjusting for confounding in a Cox proportional hazards model, we estimated one-year risks for ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA) or systemic embolism, major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding; intracranial; gastrointestinal; and other bleeding. We censored at switch of treatment or 365 days of follow-up. RESULTS: We included 30,820 treatment-naïve patients. Compared to warfarin, the adjusted hazard ratios (HR) for ischemic stroke, TIA or systemic embolism were 0.96 (95% CI 0.71-1.28) for dabigatran, 1.12 (95% CI 0.87-1.45) for rivaroxaban and 0.97 (95% CI 0.75-1.26) for apixaban. Corresponding hazard ratios for major or clinically relevant non-major bleeding were 0.73 (95% CI 0.62-0.86) for dabigatran, 0.97 (95% CI 0.84-1.12) for rivaroxaban and 0.71 (95% CI 0.62-0.82) for apixaban. Statistically significant differences of other safety outcomes compared to warfarin were fewer intracranial bleedings with dabigatran (HR 0.28, 95% CI 0.14-0.56), rivaroxaban (HR 0.40, 95% CI 0.23-0.69) and apixaban (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.34-0.92); fewer gastrointestinal bleedings with apixaban (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.52-0.93); and fewer other bleedings with dabigatran (HR 0.67, 95% CI 0.55-0.81) and apixaban (HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.59-0.83). CONCLUSION: After 1 year follow-up in treatment-naïve patients initiating oral anticoagulation for non-valvular atrial fibrillation, all DOACs were similarly effective as warfarin in prevention of ischemic stroke, TIA or systemic embolism. Safety from bleedings was similar or better, including fewer intracranial bleedings with all direct oral anticoagulants, fewer gastrointestinal bleedings with apixaban and fewer other bleedings with dabigatran and apixaban.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kjerpeseth et al. (2019) conducted a cohort in Non-valvular atrial fibrillation (n=30,820). Dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban vs. Warfarin was evaluated on Composite of hospitalization or death from ischemic stroke, transient ischemic attack (TIA), or systemic embolism (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.71-1.28). In treatment-naïve patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation, dabigatran (HR 0.96), rivaroxaban (HR 1.12), and apixaban (HR 0.97) were similarly effective as warfarin in preventing ischemic stroke, TIA, or systemic embolism over 1 year.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: