Key result
Standardized transcranial Doppler detected >15 micro-emboli in all 16 patients identified with patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography.
Why the study?
Does a standardized transcranial Doppler (TCD) protocol accurately detect venous-to-arterial circulation shunts compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in young adults following ischemic stroke or myocardial infarction?
Observational (n=39)
Blinded observers
Does a standardized transcranial Doppler (TCD) protocol accurately detect venous-to-arterial circulation shunts compared to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) in young adults following ischemic stroke or myocardial infarction?
A standardized TCD protocol with provocation maneuvers is highly sensitive for diagnosing PFO and may measure the functional importance of shunts more accurately than TEE.
May support standardized TCD for PFO detection post-stroke/MI; leaves open prospective validation versus TEE before clinical adoption.
PURPOSE: As paradoxical embolism is associated with stroke in young adults, migraine, and decompression sickness, the detection of venous-to-arterial circulation shunt (v-aCS), such as patent foramen ovale (PFO), is increasingly important. We compared a rigorous transcranial Doppler (TCD) protocol with transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) to develop criteria for PFO. METHODS: Standardized TCD was performed 2 weeks before simultaneous TEE and TCD in 39 patients aged 15-39 following ischemic stroke (n = 33) or myocardial infarction (n = 6). V-aCS was investigated by contrast sonography. During standardized TCD, contrast injections were performed twice, at rest and with cough and Valsalva maneuvers. TCD and TEE were recorded and analyzed independently by 'blinded' observers. RESULTS: All 16 of the 39 patients with PFO on TEE had more than 15 micro-emboli on standardized TCD; in 14 of these 16, paradoxical embolization required no provocation. Three of 9 patients with 'major' v-aCS (>50 microbubble emboli at rest or >10 at rest with >80 on provocation) on standardized TCD were not identified by TEE as having large shunts. CONCLUSION: The standardized TCD protocol is sensitive in the diagnosis of PFO and with the use of provocation maneuvers measures the functional importance of v-aCS more accurately than TEE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sastry et al. (2009) conducted an observational in Ischemic stroke or myocardial infarction (n=39). Standardized transcranial Doppler (TCD) vs. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was evaluated on Detection of patent foramen ovale (PFO). Standardized transcranial Doppler detected >15 micro-emboli in all 16 patients identified with patent foramen ovale by transesophageal echocardiography.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: