Key result
Contrast transcranial Doppler using a cutoff of ≥2 microembolic signals accurately diagnosed large patent foramen ovale with 96.3% sensitivity, 96.8% specificity, and 96.9% accuracy.
Why the study?
Does contrast transcranial Doppler accurately diagnose large patent foramen ovale compared to contrast transesophageal echocardiography in patients evaluated for right-to-left shunts?
Cross-Sectional (n=107)
Does contrast transcranial Doppler accurately diagnose large patent foramen ovale compared to contrast transesophageal echocardiography in patients evaluated for right-to-left shunts?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Contrast transcranial Doppler is a highly sensitive and specific non-invasive tool for diagnosing large patent foramen ovale when using a cutoff of ≥2 microembolic signals.
BACKGROUND: Contrast transesophageal echocardiography (c-TEE) and contrast transcranial Doppler (c-TCD) are useful diagnostic tools for detecting right-to-left shunts (RLS). However, the diagnostic accuracy of c-TCD for patent foramen ovale (PFO) remains uncertain. We investigated the relationship between the size of PFO determined by c-TEE and c-TCD findings and assessed the detectable rate of RLS by c-TCD. METHODS: We assessed RLS three times using simultaneous c-TCD and c-TEE in 107 patients (321 examinations). We classified all of ultrasound examinations into three groups by size according to microbubbles on c-TEE, such as no PFO (0 microbubble), small PFO (1-29 microbubbles) and large PFO (>or=30 microbubbles). We also calculated the number of microembolic signals (MES) on c-TCD and evaluated the association between PFO size on c-TEE and MES count on c-TCD. RESULTS: In the present study, c-TEE detected RLS in 105 (33%; small PFO, n = 78; large PFO, n = 27), and c-TCD detected RLS in 49 (15%) of 321 examinations. Among 78 examinations with small PFO, MES were found in only 19 (24%) on c-TCD. In contrast, of all 27 examinations with large PFO, MES were found on c-TCD. Also, c-TCD were able to detect MES in 3 of 216 examinations among the no-PFO group. When >or=2 MES on c-TCD was established as the cutoff to predict large PFO on c-TEE, the sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were 96.3, 96.8, and 96.9%, respectively. CONCLUSION: When two or more MES were determined by c-TCD, large PFO could be accurately diagnosed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kobayashi et al. (2009) conducted a cross-sectional in Patent foramen ovale (n=107). Contrast transcranial Doppler (c-TCD) vs. Contrast transesophageal echocardiography (c-TEE) was evaluated on Prediction of large PFO on c-TEE using ≥2 microembolic signals on c-TCD. Contrast transcranial Doppler using a cutoff of ≥2 microembolic signals accurately diagnosed large patent foramen ovale with 96.3% sensitivity, 96.8% specificity, and 96.9% accuracy.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: