Key result
Contrast transcranial Doppler ultrasound with Echovist-300 identified 100% (31/31) of echocardiography-proven cardiac right-to-left shunts, compared to 93.5% (29/31) with saline.
Why the study?
Does contrast TCD with Echovist-300 improve the detection of right-to-left shunts compared to agitated saline in patients?
RCT (n=81)
randomized way
Does contrast TCD with Echovist-300 improve the detection of right-to-left shunts compared to agitated saline in patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 100% vs 93.5%
Contrast TCD using Echovist-300 provides 100% sensitivity for detecting TEE-proven cardiac right-to-left shunts, outperforming agitated saline.
May enhance TCD shunt detection in stroke evaluation; leaves open need for prospective validation versus saline.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: A cardiac right-to-left shunt (RLS) can be identified by transesophageal echocardiography and transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD) with contrast agents and a Valsalva maneuver (VM) as a provocation procedure. This article applies the modalities of these tests detailed in previous studies to a large patient cohort and compares 2 contrast agents (saline and Echovist-300). METHODS: Eighty-one patients were investigated by both transesophageal echocardiography and bilateral TCD of the middle cerebral arteries. The following protocol with injections of 10 mL agitated saline was applied in a randomized way: (1) no VM, (2) VM for 5 seconds starting 5 seconds after the beginning of contrast injection, and (3) repetition of the test with VM if the first test with VM was negative. The VM was performed for 5 seconds starting exactly 5 seconds after the beginning of saline injection. Thereafter, the same protocol was repeated with 10 mL Echovist-300 instead of saline. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients had a cardiac RLS. The Echovist-300 investigation disclosed all these 31 shunts, but saline disclosed only 29 of them. Twenty-two had an RLS only in at least 1 of the above TCD tests, some of them even with a considerable shunt volume. CONCLUSIONS: Contrast TCD performed with Echovist-300 but not with saline yields a 100% sensitivity to identify transesophageal echocardiography-proven cardiac RLSs. The TCD test should be repeated if negative the first time. This article gives detailed information for the optimization of the contrast TCD technique. Extracardiac shunts detected only during contrast TCD can have a considerable shunt volume and may allow for paradoxical embolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Droste et al. (2002) conducted an RCT in cardiac right-to-left shunt (RLS) (n=81). Echovist-300 vs. agitated saline was evaluated on Identification of transesophageal echocardiography-proven cardiac right-to-left shunts. Contrast transcranial Doppler ultrasound with Echovist-300 identified 100% (31/31) of echocardiography-proven cardiac right-to-left shunts, compared to 93.5% (29/31) with saline.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: