Key result
Preoperative body mass index categories showed no significant difference in 15-year all-cause mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (log-rank P = 0.400).
Why the study?
The study investigated whether an obesity paradox exists for long-term mortality after primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery, and if any discrepancy is attributable to cardiovascular versus noncardiovascular causes.
Does elevated preoperative body mass index (overweight or obesity) confer a protective effect on long-term all-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting?
Cohort (n=5,242)
No
Does elevated preoperative body mass index (overweight or obesity) confer a protective effect on long-term all-cause and cause-specific mortality in patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass grafting?
This large, long-term competing risk analysis refutes the 'obesity paradox' in primary isolated CABG patients, showing no survival advantage for obesity and reinforcing the need for weight management in secondary coronary prevention.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Challenges obesity paradox after CABG; leaves open whether weight management improves long-term survival in secondary prevention.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this sudy was to investigate the presence of an obesity paradox on the long-term mortality of patients undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery and to uncover whether any discrepancy found could be attributable to cardiovascular or noncardiovascular causes. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of 5242 consecutive patients with body mass index (BMI) over 18.5 kg/m2 undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery, performed from 2000 to 2015, in a Portuguese level III Hospital. The primary end point was long-term all-cause mortality. Secondary outcomes were long-term cause-specific mortality (cardiovascular and noncardiovascular). We fitted overall, and cause-specific hazard models, with BMI forced both as a categorical (using World Health Organization predefined cutoffs) and as a continuous variable. RESULTS: Follow-up was 99.7% complete. The median follow-up time was 12.79 years (interquartile range, 9.51-16.61). The cumulative incidence functions failed to uncover any difference in 15-year all-cause (log-rank test, P = 0.400), cardiovascular (Gray's test, P = 0.996) and noncardiovascular mortality (Gray's test, P = 0.305) between BMI categories. Likewise, extensive multivariable-adjusted Cox regression and cause-specific hazards models failed to demonstrate in-between category differences, with BMI forced as a categorical variable. On the other hand, using BMI as a continuous variable, the model identified the optimal BMI as between 25.8 and 30.3 kg/m2 (nadir around 28.9 kg/m2), albeit this was dependent on the definition of the reference value. CONCLUSIONS: In this longitudinal, population-level analysis of patients undergoing isolated primary coronary artery bypass grafting, we could not attest to any protective effect of obesity on long-term survival.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Abreu et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Coronary artery disease undergoing primary isolated coronary artery bypass surgery (n=5,242). Preoperative body mass index (overweight, obesity, severe obesity, and morbid obesity categories, as well as continuous BMI) vs. Normal weight (18.50 < BMI < 24.99 kg/m2) was evaluated on Long-term (15-year) all-cause mortality (p=0.400). Preoperative body mass index categories showed no significant difference in 15-year all-cause mortality after isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (log-rank P = 0.400).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: