Key result
Valve-in-valve therapy is an evolving alternative to redo surgery for degenerated bioprosthetic valves, requiring careful attention to valve sizing and positioning to avoid complications such as coronary obstruction.
Valve-in-valve therapy is an evolving alternative to high-risk re-operation for structural valve deterioration, requiring operator awareness of specific procedural challenges.
Demands precise preprocedural planning for valve-in-valve procedures; leaves open need for randomized data versus redo surgery.
At present, the majority of surgical heart valves (SHVs) implanted are bioprosthetic valves. Over time however, these are prone to structural deterioration, which may manifest as valvular stenosis, regurgitation or a combination of the two. Re-operation is the current standard of care for these patients but this itself carries a significant risk of mortality and morbidity. As a natural extension of transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI), now an evidence based solution for severe aortic stenosis in high-risk patients, valve-in-valve (VIV) therapy is evolving into an alternative option in selected patients with structural biological valvular deterioration in all four-valve positions. The first of these VIV procedures was performed in Germany in 2007, for failing aortic valve prosthesis and later, reported in other positions. As with any novel emerging therapy, there is a learning curve to the procedure and the operator must be aware of the potential challenges. In this review we describe some of these challenges with the aim of providing awareness as well as guidance on attaining a successful outcome.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Noorani et al. (2015) conducted a review in Degenerated surgical heart valves. Valve-in-valve (VIV) therapy was evaluated. Valve-in-valve therapy is an evolving alternative to redo surgery for degenerated bioprosthetic valves, requiring careful attention to valve sizing and positioning to avoid complications such as coronary obstruction.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: