Key result
Systolic SAPPHIRE T1-mapping yielded significantly lower T1 values (1563 ms) compared to diastolic imaging (1580 ms) and demonstrated resilience to arrhythmia-induced motion artifacts.
Why the study?
Does systolic saturation-recovery T1-mapping (SAPPHIRE) improve T1-mapping accuracy and robustness against arrhythmia compared to diastolic T1-mapping?
Cross-Sectional (n=21)
No
Does systolic saturation-recovery T1-mapping (SAPPHIRE) improve T1-mapping accuracy and robustness against arrhythmia compared to diastolic T1-mapping?
Absolute Event Rate: 1563% vs 1580%
p-value: p=0.0124
Systolic saturation-recovery T1-mapping (SAPPHIRE) provides accurate myocardial T1 and ECV quantification with increased robustness against partial-voluming and arrhythmia compared to conventional diastolic imaging.
Systolic SAPPHIRE T1-mapping may reduce motion artifacts in arrhythmia; leaves open whether it improves diagnostic accuracy or outcomes.
Myocardial T 1 -mapping, a cardiac magnetic resonance imaging technique, facilitates a quantitative measure of fibrosis which is linked to numerous cardiovascular symptoms. To overcome the problems of common techniques, including lack of accuracy and robustness against partial-voluming and heart-rate variability, we introduce a systolic saturation-recovery T 1 -mapping method. The Saturation-Pulse Prepared Heart-rate independent Inversion-Recovery (SAPPHIRE) T 1 -mapping method was modified to enable imaging during systole. Phantom measurements were used to evaluate the insensitivity of systolic T 1 -mapping towards heart-rate variability. In-vivo feasibility and accuracy were demonstrated in ten healthy volunteers with native and post-contrast T 1 -mappping during systole and diastole. To show benefits in the presence of RR-variability, six arrhythmic patients underwent native T 1 -mapping. Resulting systolic SAPPHIRE T 1 -values showed no dependence on arrhythmia in phantom (CoV < 1%). In-vivo , significantly lower T 1 (1563 ± 56 ms, precision: 84.8 ms) and ECV-values (0.20 ± 0.03) than during diastole (T 1 = 1580 ± 62 ms, p = 0.0124; precision: 60.2 ms, p = 0.03; ECV = 0.21 ± 0.03, p = 0.0098) were measured, with a strong correlation of systolic and diastolic T 1 (r = 0.89). In patients, mis-triggering-induced motion caused significant imaging artifacts in diastolic T 1 -maps, whereas systolic T 1 -maps displayed resilience to arrythmia. In conclusion, the proposed method enables saturation-recovery T 1 -mapping during systole, providing increased robustness against partial-voluming compared to diastolic imaging, for the benefit of T 1 -measurements in arrhythmic patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meßner et al. (2018) conducted a cross-sectional in Arrhythmia (n=21). Systolic SAPPHIRE T1-mapping vs. Diastolic SAPPHIRE T1-mapping was evaluated on Myocardial T1 value in healthy volunteers (p=0.0124). Systolic SAPPHIRE T1-mapping yielded significantly lower T1 values (1563 ms) compared to diastolic imaging (1580 ms) and demonstrated resilience to arrhythmia-induced motion artifacts.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: