Key result
Exchange of fragments encoding the receptor-binding region of VP4 resulted in successful rescue of viable rotavirus reassortants, whereas exchange of domains interacting with VP6 and VP7 did not.
Why the study?
The reasons for strain-dependent reassortment restrictions when rescuing viable rotavirus species A reassortants containing heterologous VP4 were unknown.
The rescue of infectious rotavirus reassortants using a reverse genetics system is restricted by the receptor-binding region of the VP4 spike protein.
Strain-dependent VP4 reassortment viability in RVA; leaves open molecular barriers to successful reassortment.
The rotavirus species A (RVA) capsid contains the spike protein VP4, which interacts with VP6 and VP7 and is involved in cellular receptor binding. The capsid encloses the genome consisting of eleven dsRNA segments. Reassortment events can result in novel strains with changed properties. Using a plasmid-based reverse genetics system based on simian RVA strain SA11, we previously showed that the rescue of viable reassortants containing a heterologous VP4-encoding genome segment was strain-dependent. In order to unravel the reasons for the reassortment restrictions, we designed here a series of plasmids encoding chimeric VP4s. Exchange of the VP4 domains interacting with VP6 and VP7 was not sufficient for rescue of viable viruses. In contrast, the exchange of fragments encoding the receptor-binding region of VP4 resulted in virus rescue. All parent strains and the rescued reassortants replicated efficiently in MA-104 cells used for virus propagation. In contrast, replication in BSR T7/5 cells used for plasmid transfection was only efficient for the SA11 strain, whereas the rescued reassortants replicated slowly, and the parent strains failing to produce reassortants did not replicate. While future research in this area is necessary, replication in BSR T7/5 cells may be one factor that affects the rescue of RVAs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Falkenhagen et al. (2021) studied Rotavirus species A. Exchange of fragments encoding the receptor-binding region of VP4 vs. Exchange of VP4 domains interacting with VP6 and VP7 was evaluated on Rescue of viable reassortants. Exchange of fragments encoding the receptor-binding region of VP4 resulted in successful rescue of viable rotavirus reassortants, whereas exchange of domains interacting with VP6 and VP7 did not.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: