Key result
Omecamtiv mecarbil pharmacokinetics were not meaningfully affected by renal impairment or hemodialysis, with geometric mean ratios for AUC and Cmax ranging from 85.2 to 125.9 compared to normal renal function.
Why the study?
The study was conducted to estimate the effect of varying degrees of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of a single 50 mg dose of omecamtiv mecarbil under fasted conditions.
Does varying degrees of renal impairment affect the pharmacokinetics of a single 50 mg oral dose of omecamtiv mecarbil?
Does varying degrees of renal impairment affect the pharmacokinetics of a single 50 mg oral dose of omecamtiv mecarbil?
Effect estimate: GMR 85.2-125.9
Omecamtiv mecarbil pharmacokinetics are not meaningfully affected by renal impairment or hemodialysis, suggesting no dose adjustment is required for patients with renal dysfunction.
Omecamtiv mecarbil PK characterized across renal function; leaves open dose adjustment needs in HFrEF pending larger trials.
Omecamtiv mecarbil is a novel selective cardiac myosin activator (myotrope) under investigation for the treatment of heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. The objective of this clinical study was to estimate the effect of varying degrees of renal impairment on the pharmacokinetics of omecamtiv mecarbil single dose (50 mg) under fasted conditions. This phase I, open-label, non-randomized, parallel-group study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single oral dose of omecamtiv mecarbil 50 mg in individuals with normal renal function or mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment, including end-stage renal disease requiring dialysis. Geometric least-squares mean ratios of maximum observed concentration ( C max ) and area under the plasma concentration–time curve (AUC) and 90% confidence intervals were derived for comparisons of renal impairment vs normal renal function. Participants were monitored for adverse events. Thirty-one participants received treatment and completed the study. Geometric mean exposures were similar for participants with renal impairment (AUC ∞ range, 2550–3220 h*ng/mL; C max range, 78.9–107 ng/mL) and participants with normal renal function (AUC ∞ , 2790 h*ng/mL; C max , 92.6 ng/mL), with geometric least-squares mean ratios of 85.2–125.9. Exposure was similar on dialysis vs non-dialysis days in participants with end-stage renal disease (AUC 0–24 , 1650 vs 1700 h*ng/mL; C max , 100.0 vs 107.0 ng/mL). Four participants (12.9%) reported four treatment-emergent adverse events. No deaths, treatment-emergent adverse events leading to discontinuation, or serious adverse events occurred. Omecamtiv mecarbil pharmacokinetics were not meaningfully affected by renal function or hemodialysis, suggesting the same dosing strategy can be used in individuals with normal renal function or renal impairment. Oral administration of omecamtiv mecarbil was not associated with major tolerability findings. This study supports omecamtiv mecarbil for the treatment of heart failure in individuals with or without renal impairment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Trivedi et al. (2021) studied Renal impairment (n=31). Omecamtiv mecarbil vs. Normal renal function was evaluated on Maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) (GMR 85.2-125.9). Omecamtiv mecarbil pharmacokinetics were not meaningfully affected by renal impairment or hemodialysis, with geometric mean ratios for AUC and Cmax ranging from 85.2 to 125.9 compared to normal renal function.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: