Why the study?
Does clinical classification of painful arc syndrome guide effective management with injections or surgery?
Does clinical classification of painful arc syndrome guide effective management with injections or surgery?
Clinical classification of painful arc syndrome based on lesion location can guide appropriate treatment with either local injections or surgery.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports lesion-specific management of painful arc syndrome; leaves open need for prospective validation before practice change.
Ninety-seven patients suffering from painful arc syndrome of the shoulder were studied. Local anaesthetic and radiographic contrast investigations were carried out. One-third of the patients had lesions in the posterior part of the rotator cuff which resolved after injections of local anaesthetic and steroid. One-third had anterior lesions in the subscapularis tendon: almost all resolved under the same regime but two required division of the coraco-acromial ligament. The remaining third had lesions of the supraspinatus tendon, usually associated with degeneration of the acromio-clavicular joint: most of these failed to gain relief from the local anaesthetic and steroid. Twenty-two operations were performed either by a transcromial or by a deltoid splitting approach. Excision of the outer end of the clavicle and division of the coraco-acromial ligament abolished the pain in most cases.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kessel et al. (1977) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: