Key result
Siblings of children with latent rheumatic heart disease were 4.5 times more likely to have definite RHD compared to siblings of healthy peers.
Why the study?
Does echocardiographic family screening identify a higher risk of latent RHD in first-degree relatives of children with latent RHD compared to relatives of healthy peers?
Cross-Sectional (n=455)
Reviewers blinded to the RHD status of the index child
No
Does echocardiographic family screening identify a higher risk of latent RHD in first-degree relatives of children with latent RHD compared to relatives of healthy peers?
Relative Risk: 4.5 (95% CI 1–20.2)
Absolute Event Rate: 13.3% vs 3%
p-value: p=0.052
Siblings of children with latent rheumatic heart disease have a significantly higher risk of having definite RHD, suggesting that targeted sibling screening should be prioritized following the detection of an index case.
May support sibling screening in RHD-endemic areas; hypothesis-generating for familial risk factors.
BACKGROUND: Echocardiographic screening for detection of latent RHD has shown potential as a strategy to decrease the burden of disease. However, further research is needed to determine optimal implementation strategies. RHD results from a complex interplay between environment and host susceptibility. Family members share both and relatives of children with latent RHD may represent a high-risk group. The objective of this study was to use echocardiographic family screening to determine the relative risk of RHD among first-degree relatives of children with latent RHD compared to the risk in first-degree relatives of healthy peers. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Previous school-based screening data were used to identify RHD positive children and RHD negative peers. All first-degree relatives ≥ 5 years were invited for echocardiography screening (2012 World Heart Federation Criteria). Sixty RHD positive cases (30 borderline/30 definite RHD) and 67 RHD negative cases were recruited. A total of 455/667 (68%) family members were screened. Definite RHD was more common in childhood siblings of RHD positive compared to RHD negative (p = 0.05). Children with any RHD were 4.5 times as likely to have a sibling with definite RHD, a risk that increased to 5.6 times when considering only cases with definite RHD. Mothers of RHD positive and RHD negative cases had an unexpectedly high rate of latent RHD (9.3%). CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Siblings of RHD positive cases with RHD are more likely to have definite RHD and the relative risk is highest if the index case has definite RHD. Future screening programs should consider implementation of sibling screening following detection of an RHD positive child. Larger screening studies of adults are needed, as data on prevalence of latent RHD outside of childhood are sparse. Future studies should prioritize implementation research to answer questions of how RHD screening can best be integrated into existing healthcare structures, ensuring practical and sustainable screening programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Aliku et al. (2016) conducted a cross-sectional in Latent Rheumatic Heart Disease (n=455). Index case with latent rheumatic heart disease vs. Index case without rheumatic heart disease was evaluated on Risk of having a sibling with definite RHD (RR 4.5, 95% CI 1-20.2, p=0.052). Siblings of children with latent rheumatic heart disease were 4.5 times more likely to have definite RHD compared to siblings of healthy peers.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: