Key result
NT-proBNP outperformed BNP for diagnosing covert atrial fibrillation after acute ischaemic stroke, with a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.65-0.98) and specificity of 0.77.
Why the study?
Detection of AF after acute ischaemic stroke is pivotal for timely anticoagulation, prompting evaluation of cardiac natriuretic peptides as complementary diagnostic tools for covert AF.
Does the measurement of BNP or NT-proBNP accurately diagnose covert atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ischaemic stroke?
Meta-Analysis (n=2,553)
Does the measurement of BNP or NT-proBNP accurately diagnose covert atrial fibrillation in patients with acute ischaemic stroke?
Effect estimate: Sensitivity 0.91 (95% CI 0.65 to 0.98)
NT-proBNP and BNP have low post-test probabilities for diagnosing covert AF after acute ischemic stroke and should not be used as stand-alone tools, but may help select patients for long-term rhythm monitoring.
NT-proBNP may refine post-stroke AF risk stratification; leaves open whether biomarker thresholds improve detection or outcomes in prospective studies.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Detection of atrial fibrillation (AF) after acute ischaemic stroke is pivotal for the timely initiation of anticoagulation to prevent recurrence. Besides heart rhythm monitoring, various blood biomarkers have been suggested as complimentary diagnostic tools for AF. We aimed to summarise data on the performance of cardiac natriuretic peptides for the diagnosis of covert AF after acute ischaemic stroke and to assess their potential clinical utility. METHODS: We searched PubMed and Embase for prospective studies reporting the performance of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-BNP (NT-proBNP) for the diagnosis of covert AF after acute ischaemic stroke. Summary diagnostic performance measures were pooled using bivariate meta-analysis with a random-effect model. RESULTS: We included six studies focusing on BNP (n=1930) and three studies focusing on NT-proBNP (n=623). BNP had a sensitivity of 0.83 (95% CI 0.64 to 0.93), a specificity of 0.74 (0.67 to 0.81), a positive likelihood ratio of 3.2 (2.6 to 4.0) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.23 (0.11 to 0.49). NT-proBNP had a sensitivity of 0.91 (0.65 to 0.98), a specificity of 0.77 (0.52 to 0.91), a positive likelihood ratio of 3.9 (1.8 to 8.7) and a negative likelihood ratio of 0.12 (0.03 to 0.48). Considering a pretest probability of 20%, BNP and NT-proBNP had post-test probabilities of 45% and 50%. CONCLUSIONS: NT-proBNP has a better performance than BNP for the diagnosis of covert AF after acute ischaemic stroke. Both biomarkers have low post-test probabilities and may not be used as a stand-alone decision-making tool for the diagnosis of covert AF in patients with acute ischaemic stroke. However, they may be useful for a screening strategy aiming to select patients for long-term monitoring of the heart rhythm.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2020) conducted a meta-analysis in Covert atrial fibrillation after acute ischaemic stroke (n=2,553). Cardiac natriuretic peptides (BNP and NT-proBNP) was evaluated on Diagnosis of covert atrial fibrillation (Sensitivity 0.91, 95% CI 0.65 to 0.98). NT-proBNP outperformed BNP for diagnosing covert atrial fibrillation after acute ischaemic stroke, with a sensitivity of 0.91 (95% CI 0.65-0.98) and specificity of 0.77.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: