Key result
Stent fracture after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation was associated with a higher 8-year rate of any target lesion revascularization compared to no fracture (38.1% vs 10.8%, P<0.001).
Why the study?
Does stent fracture increase target lesion revascularization and adverse cardiac events in patients with sirolimus-eluting stents?
Cohort (n=954)
Does stent fracture increase target lesion revascularization and adverse cardiac events in patients with sirolimus-eluting stents?
Stent fracture after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation is associated with significantly higher long-term risks of target lesion revascularization, myocardial infarction, and very late stent thrombosis over an 8-year follow-up.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May prompt fracture evaluation during late revascularization; leaves open whether detection alters management.
BACKGROUND: Stent fracture (SF) after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation is reported to be associated with target lesion revascularization (TLR) and stent thrombosis. We aimed to assess the clinical impact of SF at 8 years. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between 2002 and 2005, 972 patients (1795 lesions) underwent sirolimus-eluting stent implantation and follow-up angiography within 1 year after index procedure. SF, defined as the complete separation of stent segments or stent struts at follow-up angiography, was observed in 105 lesions (5.8%). The study sample comprised 954 patients (1630 lesions), excluding 147 lesions undergoing TLR and 18 patients (18 lesions) who died or in whom stent thrombosis developed within 1 year after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation. The median follow-up duration was 9.1 years (the first and third quarters, 8.7 and 9.4 years). The primary end point was defined as any TLR. The 8-year cumulative rates of adverse events were estimated by Kaplan-Meier methods with P values from log-rank tests. Between patients with and without SF, there were no significant differences in the cumulative rates of all-cause death (23.5% versus 27.6%, P=0.35) and cardiac death (4.7% versus 9.1%, P=0.14), whereas patients with SF had significantly higher cumulative rates in myocardial infarction (10.1% versus 3.3%, P=0.001), very late stent thrombosis (6.8% versus 0.7%, P<0.001), any TLR (38.1% versus 10.8%, P<0.001), and clinically driven TLR (26.2% versus 6.6%, P<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: SF after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation was consistently associated with higher rates of adverse cardiac events during the 8-year follow-up.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohya et al. (2015) conducted a cohort in Sirolimus-eluting stent implantation (n=954). Stent fracture vs. No stent fracture was evaluated on Any target lesion revascularization (TLR) (p=<0.001). Stent fracture after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation was associated with a higher 8-year rate of any target lesion revascularization compared to no fracture (38.1% vs 10.8%, P<0.001).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: