Why the study?
Does exercise testing provide prognostic information in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease?
Does exercise testing provide prognostic information in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease?
Exercise testing provides important prognostic insights and risk stratification for patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports prognostic stratification with exercise testing in CAD; leaves open prospective validation in contemporary cohorts.
During the past three decades, the exercise test has evolved into a method of considerable importance in the evaluation of patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. Exercise testing aids physicians in making the diagnosis, in quantifying the functional limitation caused by the disease in individual patients, and in evaluating therapeutic effects. Exercise testing may also yield important prognostic insights. Exercise capacity, heart-rate and blood-pressure responses, and the presence and severity of symptoms and electrocardiographic evidence of inducible myocardial ischemia are among the variables that have value in risk stratification; these indexes provide additional prognostic information beyond that obtained . . .
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Robert O. Bonow (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: