Key result
Protein-modified stents deployed in a tissue-engineered blood vessel mimic showed accelerated cellular regeneration, increased coverage, and increased tissue thickness compared to bare metal stents.
Why the study?
Do protein-modified stents improve endothelialization compared to bare metal stents in a tissue-engineered blood vessel mimic?
Do protein-modified stents improve endothelialization compared to bare metal stents in a tissue-engineered blood vessel mimic?
Protein-modified stents show accelerated cellular regeneration and tissue coverage in a tissue-engineered blood vessel mimic, supporting this in vitro system for preclinical stent evaluation.
Supports protein-modified stents in engineered models; leaves open clinical translation.
Protein-coated intravascular stents have emerged as potential pro-healing modifications for or alternatives to anti-proliferative drug-eluting stents. To support the development of these devices, preclinical testing is required to evaluate the intimal response to new coatings and modifications. The purpose of this work was to implement a tissue-engineered blood vessel as an in vitro testing system to evaluate extracellular matrix-modified stents with regard to endothelialization of the stent surface. Stents were modified by submersion in a protein-enriched medium and were subsequently deployed within tissue-engineered blood vessels and cultivated in vitro under flow to assess the intimal response. Scanning electron microscopy, fluorescent nuclear staining with en face imaging, and histological assessments were performed 7 or 14 days postdeployment. Results illustrated accelerated cellular regeneration over protein-modified stent strut surfaces, with increased coverage and increased tissue thickness atop protein-modified stent struts. In addition, the intimal response to modified stents differed significantly from bare metal stents. Conclusions from this work support the use of a tissue-engineered blood vessel mimic system for evaluation of modified stent surfaces. These findings are important to stent researchers as well as laboratories developing tissue-engineered constructs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cardinal et al. (2009) studied this question. Protein-modified stent vs. Bare metal stents was evaluated on Intimal response (endothelialization, cellular regeneration, tissue thickness). Protein-modified stents deployed in a tissue-engineered blood vessel mimic showed accelerated cellular regeneration, increased coverage, and increased tissue thickness compared to bare metal stents.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: