Why the study?
Does low-dose alteplase improve symptoms and objective measures in patients with symptomatic submassive pulmonary embolism?
Case Report (n=9)
Does low-dose alteplase improve symptoms and objective measures in patients with symptomatic submassive pulmonary embolism?
Low-dose, short-course alteplase may provide symptomatic and objective improvement in submassive pulmonary embolism, warranting further investigation in randomized trials.
Low-dose alteplase may be feasible in submassive PE; leaves open need for larger RCTs on efficacy and safety.
: Guidelines-recommend thrombolytic therapy for pulmonary embolism in patients with severe hemodynamic compromise and low risk of bleeding. Thrombolytics in submassive pulmonary embolism have an unfavorable risk/benefit ratio and remain controversial. Based on our experience with extensive, lower extremity thrombi, nine patients with symptomatic, submassive pulmonary embolisms (five medical, four surgical) were treated with low-dose alteplase (<10 mg/day, infused over 6 h per treatment). Alteplase was delivered by pulse spray and/or directed or undirected central venous catheters depending on clot size and location. All patients improved symptomatically and as determined objectively by pulmonary artery pressures and/or imaging, though acute benefits ranged from substantial to modest. One surgical patient required re-exploration for bleeding at the site of a recent retroperitoneal lymph node dissection. This experience may help guide the design of a randomized controlled trial to determine the safety and efficacy of low-dose alteplase for submassive pulmonary embolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lozier et al. (2018) conducted a case report in symptomatic, submassive pulmonary embolism (n=9). low-dose alteplase was evaluated on symptomatic and objective improvement.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: