Why the study?
Contradictions exist in the treatment of sub-massive pulmonary embolism, with drawbacks to thrombolytic treatment due to potential serious side effects such as cranial hemorrhage.
Does intravenous alteplase improve symptoms and oxygenation in an elderly patient with sub-massive pulmonary embolism and acute arterial embolism?
Does intravenous alteplase improve symptoms and oxygenation in an elderly patient with sub-massive pulmonary embolism and acute arterial embolism?
Intravenous alteplase successfully treated sub-massive pulmonary embolism and concurrent acute arterial embolism in an elderly high-risk patient without bleeding complications.
May support thrombolysis consideration in select dual-embolism cases; leaves open confirmation in prospective trials.
Introduction: Although thrombolytic administration is inevitable in the management of massive pulmonary embolism, contradictions exist in the treatment of sub-massive pulmonary embolism. There are drawbacks to thrombolytic treatment due to potential serious side effects such as cranial hemorrhage. Case Report: An 84-year-old female patient was admitted to the emergency service because of pain and lack of a pulse in her right arm and %61 oxygen saturation without any respiratory system complaints. A computerized tomography showed pulmonary embolism close to totality in the bilateral main pulmonary arteries and peripheral embolism in the right brachial artery. We considered a sub-massive pulmonary embolism in this patient with no hypotension despite bilateral pulmonary artery embolism, good general condition, but a dilated right ventriculi in transthoracic echocardiography. Since the PESI score was 115, it was decided that the patient was in the high-risk group. After administration of 100 mg Alteplase as thrombolytic therapy, her oxygen saturation increased to 95% in the room air and her complaint of right arm completely regressed. Furthermore, none of the possible complications from thrombolytic therapy, such as fatal bleeding, were observed in our patient. Conclusion: In this article, it is emphasized that thrombolytic therapy is an appropriate choice for patients with sub-massive pulmonary embolism and acute arterial embolism.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karaman et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: