Key result
In a numerical simulation of an aortic bileaflet mechanical heart valve, an asymmetric left ventricle upstream boundary condition resulted in an 88% higher leaflet impact velocity compared to a symmetric left ventricle.
Why the study?
Does the upstream boundary condition influence the leaflet opening dynamics in numerical simulations of an aortic bileaflet mechanical heart valve?
Does the upstream boundary condition influence the leaflet opening dynamics in numerical simulations of an aortic bileaflet mechanical heart valve?
The choice of upstream boundary condition significantly affects leaflet impact velocity in numerical simulations of bileaflet mechanical heart valves.
Asymmetric upstream conditions increase simulated leaflet impact velocity; leaves open standardization of boundary conditions in valve dynamics modeling.
In this paper, the influence of the upstream boundary condition in the numerical simulation of an aortic bileaflet mechanical heart valve (BMHV) is studied. Three three-dimensional cases with different upstream boundary conditions are compared. The first case consists of a rigid straight tube with a velocity profile at its inlet. In the second case, the upstream geometry is a contracting left ventricle (LV), positioned symmetrically with respect to the valve. In the last case, the LV is positioned asymmetrical with respect to the valve. The cases are used to simulate the same three-dimensional BMHV. The change in time of the LV volume is calculated such that the flow rate through the valve is identical in each case. The opening dynamics of the BMHV are modelled using fluid-structure interaction. The simulations show that differences occur in the leaflet movement of the three cases. In particular, with the asymmetric LV, one of the leaflets impacts the blocking mechanism at its open position with a 34% higher velocity than when using the velocity profile, and with an 88% higher velocity than in the symmetric LV case. Therefore, when simulating such an impact, the upstream boundary condition needs to be chosen carefully.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Annerel et al. (2012) studied Aortic bileaflet mechanical heart valve (simulation). Asymmetric left ventricle upstream boundary condition vs. Symmetric left ventricle and rigid straight tube with velocity profile was evaluated on Leaflet impact velocity at open position. In a numerical simulation of an aortic bileaflet mechanical heart valve, an asymmetric left ventricle upstream boundary condition resulted in an 88% higher leaflet impact velocity compared to a symmetric left ventricle.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: