A new approach to SO(10) grand unification was recently proposed by three of the authors (D.C., R.N.M., and M.K.P.), where the mass scale MP at which the D-parity symmetry present in the SO(10) group breaks was of the right-handed currents. In contrast with the conventional treatment of the SO(10) model, SU(2)L×{}SU(2)R×{}G [G is SU(4)C or SU(3)C×{}U(1)_B-L] can appear as an intermediate symmetry with gL{≠}gR. Calculations in the one-loop approximation lead to a substantially different picture of intermediate mass scales for SO(10)-symmetry breaking than before. In this paper, this analysis is extended to include two-loop contributions which are significant for several symmetry-breaking chains. All possible chains descending to the standard group SU(2)L×{}U(1)Y×{}SU(3)C are examined. A unique chain emerges if one imposes a minimality condition (using the lowest-dimensional Higgs multiplet at each symmetry-breaking stage) and the phenomenological requirements of {≥}2×{}10³² yr, sin²{{{θ}}}W$(${M}W) =0.22±0.02, and{{α}}ₛ$(${M}W)=0.10--0.12. This chain is SO(10)→SU(2{)}L×SU(2{)}R×SU(4{)}C×P →SU(2{)}L×SU(2{)}R×SU(4{)}C→SU(2{)}L×U(1{)}R×U(1{)}_{B{{-}}1}×SU(3{)}C→SU(2{)}L×U(1{)}Y×SU(3{)}C$ and allows for the following detectable consequences: (a) neutron oscillations with ${{τ}}_{nn{}}~{10}⁸$--${10}⁹$ sec; (b) a branching ratio for ${K}L→μ ē \=e of 7×{(10}^{{{-}}8}$--${10}^{{{-}}12}$); (c) a second neutral ${Z}R$ boson in the (1/2)-to-10-TeV range; (d) a proton lifetime ${{τ}}ₚ=6.5×{10}^{35.0±{}0.9}(Λ MS/160 MeV{)}⁴$ yr (MS{} denotes the modified minimal subtraction scheme), which, given the theoretical uncertainties, may barely be within experimental reach; (e) a Majorana mass for the electron neutrino in the range of electron volts. This experimentally interesting chain also predicts MP{}10^14.3±1.0 GeV, which satisfies all cosmological constraints. All other symmetry-breaking chains that satisfy the phenomenological requirements do not have experimentally testable consequences at low energies.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chang et al. (1985) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: