Key result
Aleglitazar did not reduce the risk of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke compared to placebo (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.83-1.11; P=.57) and increased rates of safety end points.
Why the study?
Does aleglitazar reduce cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a recent acute coronary syndrome?
Population
7,226 patients hospitalized for acute coronary syndrome with type 2 diabetes mellitus
Comparison
Aleglitazar 150 µg daily added to standard… vs Placebo daily added to standard medical therapy
Design
RCT, 1:1 ratio, double-blind, placebo-controlled
Follow-up
median 104 weeks
Authors
Loading...
Aleglitazar should not be used in type 2 diabetes with recent ACS; challenges dual PPAR agonism for cardiovascular risk reduction.
RCT (n=7,226)
Double-blind
1:1
Yes
Does aleglitazar reduce cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus and a recent acute coronary syndrome?
Hazard Ratio: 0.96 (95% CI 0.83–1.11)
Absolute Event Rate: 9.5% vs 10%
p-value: p=.57
Aleglitazar does not reduce cardiovascular risk in patients with type 2 diabetes and recent ACS, and is associated with increased risks of gastrointestinal hemorrhage and renal dysfunction.
Lincoff et al. (2014) conducted an RCT in Type 2 diabetes mellitus and recent acute coronary syndrome (n=7,226). Aleglitazar vs. Placebo was evaluated on time to cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, or nonfatal stroke (HR 0.96, 95% CI 0.83-1.11, p=.57). Aleglitazar did not reduce the risk of cardiovascular death, nonfatal MI, or nonfatal stroke compared to placebo (HR 0.96; 95% CI 0.83-1.11; P=.57) and increased rates of safety end points.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: