Key result
No clinical study data is present in the provided text, which consists only of journal front matter and editorial board listings.
Why the study?
Pulmonary hypertension presents nonspecifically, causing detection delays, while early differential diagnosis of pulmonary arterial hypertension and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension is critical for initiating specific therapies.
Key points are not available for this paper at this time.
Design
Overview and clinical guidance document
Persistent diagnostic delays in PH warrant heightened suspicion; leaves open validation of risk tools for PAH/CTEPH identification.
The clinical presentation of pulmonary hypertension (PH) is nonspecific, resulting in significant delays in its detection. In the majority of cases, PH is a marker of the severity of other cardiopulmonary diseases. Differential diagnosis aimed at the early identification of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) who do require specific and complex therapies is as important as PH detection itself. Despite all efforts aimed at the noninvasive assessment of pulmonary arterial pressure, the formal confirmation of PH still requires catheterization of the right heart and pulmonary artery. The current document will give an overview of strategies aimed at the early diagnosis of PAH and CTEPH, while avoiding their overdiagnosis. It is not intended to be a replica of the recently published European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Respiratory Society (ERS) Guidelines on Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension, freely available at the Web sites of both societies. While promoting guidelines' recommendations, including those on new definitions of PH, we will try to bring them closer to everyday clinical practice, benefiting from our personal experience in managing patients with suspected PH.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Torbicki et al. (2023) studied this question. No clinical study data is present in the provided text, which consists only of journal front matter and editorial board listings.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: