Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We assessed the diagnostic accuracy and usability of the rapid semiquantitative point of care VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay, compared to routinely obtained CD4 counts among people living with HIV in Ethiopia and Indonesia. We consecutively enrolled people living with HIV aged ≥10 years who were newly diagnosed, had interrupted antiretroviral treatment for ≥3 months, or were feeling unwell. Venous blood was drawn to obtain CD4 counts on routinely available test instruments and a VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay result. The sensitivity of VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay was high (97.8%, 95% confidence interval [CI], 94.4-99.4%), but the specificity was low (32.7%, 95%CI, 27.9-37.8%). It significantly increased to 42.5% (95%CI, 33.2-52.1%) after retraining of laboratory staff, but remained low. The low specificity of VISITECT® CD4 Advanced Disease Assay was due to poor capacity in test reading by routine staff. Reading the test strip is error-prone and requires intensive and regular training. Reading aids may improve the usability of this essential point of care test.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haas et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: