Key result
Visceral fat area showed a significantly stronger negative correlation with the CT attenuation number of the pancreas than BMI (r=-0.552 vs r=-0.345, p<0.0025).
Why the study?
Does visceral fat area correlate better with fatty infiltration of the pancreas than BMI?
Cross-Sectional (n=118)
No
Does visceral fat area correlate better with fatty infiltration of the pancreas than BMI?
Visceral fat area measured by CT is a better predictor of fatty infiltration of the pancreas than BMI.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May support visceral fat area over BMI for pancreatic steatosis assessment; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
OBJECTIVE: Obesity is a risk factor of fatty replacement of the pancreas. We aimed to investigate whether there is a better correlation between the visceral fat tissue and the fatty infiltration of the pancreas than with the BMI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: One hundred-eighteen patients were visually divided into three groups according to the pattern of the fatty infiltration of the pancreas. Group 0 (n=70) has no fatty infiltration, Group 1 (n=23) has fatty infiltration on the head only, and Group 2 (n=25) has fatty infiltration on the entire pancreas. Additionally, the attenuation numbers (HU) were measured separately at the head, body and tail of the pancreas on contrast-enhanced Computed Tomography CT. The sum of the attenuation number of each part of the pancreas was calculated as the attenuation number of the pancreas. A CT-scan was used to calculate the visceral fat area (cm(2)). Correlation coefficients were determined between the visceral fat area and fatty infiltration of the pancreas and the BMI. RESULTS: The visceral fat area showed a stronger correlation with the attenuation number of the pancreas than the BMI (r=-0.552, r=-0.345 and p=0.0001, p=0.0001, respectively). The difference existed between the Groups 0 and 1 (p=0.0001) or Groups 0 and 2 (p=0.0001) in terms of visceral fat area. The difference existed only between Group 0 and Group 2 in terms of BMI (p=0.006). CONCLUSIONS: The visceral fat tissue area has a stronger correlation than the BMI in the fatty infiltration of the pancreas.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Özbülbül et al. (2010) conducted a cross-sectional in Fatty infiltration of the pancreas (n=118). Visceral fat area vs. Body Mass Index (BMI) was evaluated on Correlation with CT attenuation number of the pancreas (r=-0.552 for visceral fat area vs r=-0.345 for BMI, p=<0.0025). Visceral fat area showed a significantly stronger negative correlation with the CT attenuation number of the pancreas than BMI (r=-0.552 vs r=-0.345, p<0.0025).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: