Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The upper and lower limits of the electrostrictive constants, dielectric permittivities, spontaneous polarizations, and piezoelectric coefficients were calculated for ceramic PbTiO(3) from theoretical single-crystal constants. Experimental ceramic data fall between these upper and lower limits. The large piezoelectric anisotropy d(33)/d(31) of ceramic PbTiO(3 ) was shown to be related to the single-crystal PbTiO(3) electrostrictive anisotropies Q(11)/Q(12 ) and Q(44)/Q(12). The possibility of a change in sign of the ceramic d(31) coefficient due to a slight variation in the single-crystal electrostrictive anisotropies was discussed. The single-crystal and predicted ceramic hydrostatic electrostrictive constants were found to be equal. Using this result the ceramic hydrostatic g(h ) coefficient is always smaller than the single-crystal g (h), but the ceramic hydrostatic d(h) coefficient can be either larger or smaller than the single-crystal d(h) depending on the dielectric anisotropy (epsilon (11)/epsilon(33)) of the single-crystal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Haun et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: