Key result
Poor CT image quality, including noise, motion artifacts, and low enhancement, was significantly associated with an increased number of false-positive CAD findings for pulmonary embolism.
Why the study?
Does CT image quality affect the false-positive rate and sensitivity of a computer-aided detection algorithm for pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography?
Observational (n=278)
Does CT image quality affect the false-positive rate and sensitivity of a computer-aided detection algorithm for pulmonary embolism in patients undergoing CT pulmonary angiography?
Poor CT image quality is strongly associated with an increased number of false-positive findings and decreased sensitivity when using a computer-aided detection algorithm for pulmonary embolism.
Poor CT quality may inflate CAD false positives for PE; hypothesis-generating for protocol optimization before routine use.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this article is to assess the relationship between CT image quality and the number and type of false-positive (FP) findings found by a prototype computer-aided detection (CAD) algorithm for automatic detection of pulmonary embolism (PE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included 278 subjects (138 men and 140 women; mean age, 57 years; range, 18-88 years) who underwent consecutive CT pulmonary angiographies performed during off hours. Twenty-four percent (68/278) of studies were reported as positive for PE. CAD findings were classified as true-positive or FP by two independent readers and, in cases of discordance, by a third radiologist. Each FP result was classified according to underlying cause. The degree of vascular enhancement, image noise, motion artifacts, overall quality, and presence of underlying lung disease were rated on a 4- or 5-point scale. Chi-square tests and t tests were used to test significance of differences. RESULTS: The mean number of FP CAD findings was 4.7 (median, 2) per examination. Most were caused by veins (30% [389/1,298]) or airspace consolidations (22% [286/1,298]). There was a significant positive association between the number of FP findings and image noise, motion artifacts, low vascular enhancement, low overall quality, and the extent of underlying disease. On a per-embolism basis, sensitivity decreased from 70.6% (214/303) for scans with zero to five FP findings, to 62.3% (33/53) for scans with six to 10 FP findings, to 60% (12/20) for scans with more than 10 FP findings. CONCLUSION: There is a strong association between CT image quality and the number of FP findings indicated by a CAD algorithm for the detection of PE.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wittenberg et al. (2010) conducted an observational in Pulmonary embolism (n=278). CT image quality was evaluated on Number and type of false-positive findings by a CAD algorithm. Poor CT image quality, including noise, motion artifacts, and low enhancement, was significantly associated with an increased number of false-positive CAD findings for pulmonary embolism.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: